Implementation
A professional feasibility workflow is not a public form with a different logo. It needs defined roles, review gates, data lineage, assumption governance, reproducibility, and an accountable human decision at the end.
Captive Feasibility is implemented with the licensed organization, tested against known cases, and released only to its approved users.
Map the licensed organization’s current review path, accountable roles, data sources, approval points, reporting obligations, and existing controls. The implementation starts with professional authority—not a public application form.
Define organization-level data fields, source-system mappings, validation rules, retention requirements, and integration boundaries. Policyholder, applicant, and claimant data are excluded unless a separately reviewed agreement and secure workflow expressly require them.
Configure access for authorized analysts, actuaries, compliance personnel, legal and tax reviewers, administrators, and decision makers. The licensed organization determines who may enter, review, approve, export, or administer information.
Select the actuarial methods, assumption controls, rationale requirements, confidence levels, scenario structure, and review notices appropriate to the organization’s governance process.
Configure board, committee, compliance, and examination outputs. Decide which inputs, changes, decisions, and approvals enter the timestamped audit record and how authorized users review the evidence behind each conclusion.
Run known cases through the configured workflow and compare the results with previously reviewed analyses. Differences are investigated rather than explained away; implementation does not proceed on an attractive screenshot alone.
Train administrators and authorized users, document responsibilities and escalation paths, confirm the technology-only boundary, and release the workflow to the licensed organization’s approved audience.
Maintain configuration, integrations, documentation, access controls, and regulatory as-of dates under the organization’s change process. Software support does not replace actuarial, legal, tax, compliance, or regulatory judgment.